Dear Phước,Về việc RFA đề xuất copp

Dear Phước,

Về việc RFA đề xuất coppha thép cho cầu thang bộ Anh cần làm rõ một số vấn đề sau:
 Phần coppha thép bỏ luôn trong cầu thang này sẽ không được tính them tiền vì mình đề xuất => cái này có sếp nào đồng ý chưa?
 Phần sơn hoàn thiện cho phần coppha thép bỏ lại trong cầu thang là phải sử dụng loại sơn dầu (sơn cho kim loại) => chi phí này có cân nhắc chưa?
 Phần gắn mũi bậc trong quá trình thi công đổ bê tong có thực hiện được hay không? Đã có công trình nào của AGC sử dụng chưa?
Phương án hoàn thiện như đề xuất sẽ giảm được chi phí cho cán nền và tô cạnh cầu thang.Tuy nhiên cần có sự so sánh giữa 2 phương án và có sự thống nhất của cấp trên.

Vì những lý do trên Anh đề nghị em làm RFA đi rồi gửi xuống Anh chuyển giúp cho,vì việc đề xuất này chi phí tang giảm Anh không kiểm soát được nên Anh không thể giúp em làm RFA này được.
Sorry em Trai vì lý do trên .

Results (English) 1:

Dear Irene,About the RFA suggest coppha for steel stairs You need to clarify a number of issues: put steel coppha Part always in this stairwell will not be charged them money because I proposed this one > = boss would agree? Paint finishing Section for steel coppha part left of the stairs is to use oil paints (painted metal) = > This has cost considerations? the nose-mounted Joint steps in the process of pouring concrete construction tong has done or not? There were works of the AGC used?Complete projects as proposed will reduce costs for the background and the Bowl next to the stairs. However need the comparison between the 2 options and have the consistency of the upper level.Because of the reasons above You suggested I do the RFA goes and then sent down to you to help, because the proposal costs reduced uncontrolled Brother tang he can't help me do this RFA.Sorry brother for reasons above.

Results (English) 2:

Dear Blessed,

ON RFA recommended for stairs steel Coppha I need to clarify some issues:
 The steel Coppha giving up the staircase will not be charged extra money for his proposed => this the boss does not agree?
 The perfect paint for the steel Coppha left of the stairs is to use oil paints (paints for metal) => costs would weigh less?
 The nose mounted during construction grade poured concrete has been done or not? Following the work of AGC used yet?
Improvement plans as proposed will reduce costs and fill screed edge thang.Tuy bridge course there should be a comparison between two options and has the consistency of their superiors.

For these reasons I do on British proposal submitted RFA gone down He moved to help, because the proposed cost reduction English tang uncontrollable so I can not help you do this RFA.
Sorry boys for reasons above.

Results (English) 3:

Dear fortune,On the coppha proposed RFA steel stairs, you need to clarify some of the issues:The part on the coppha steel stairs do not calculate their money, because I suggest the boss agreed to > =?The paint finish part of steel coppha lost in the staircase is a kind of oil (metal paint) = > cost can be measured?To paste the nose some steps in the construction process of the damaged flow than the real good or not? Is there an engineering use of AGC?The improved program and the proposed cost will reduce the background and the cost of running the stairs. However, there is a comparison between the two programs and a unified supervisor.For these reasons, I suggest you do the RFA to send to you to pass to the proposal, because this cost down the funeral you can't control, so you can't help me do this rfa.Excuse me, I'm in my son.