Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Financing ChallengesThe banks apparently regarded the prices quoted for the Eurotunnel project as fixed and set in stone, especially as the original cost estimates of TML, Eurotunnel and the banks ' technical advisors differed only by a small sumIn early 1990, Eurotunnel announced that in order to complete the project it would need £ 9 billion, 50 percent more than the figure announced during the IPO in November 1987However, in the summer of that year, some of the smaller banks withdrew their support for the loanIn 1990, Eurotunnel had spent only about £ 2 billion of the more than £ 6 billion raised in 1987, and therefore needed no further cash at that point. However, the problem was the clause in the loan agreement that required Eurotunnel to have enough cash in hand or on call to complete the entire projectOne reason for the banks ' reluctance to provide additional financing was the lack of government financial support and guarantees in such times of economic uncertaintyNot with standing, in its quest for additional funding, Eurotunnel made an upward revision of its revenue, profitability and market share estimates for the period from 1993 to 2042According to the projections made in 1990, the ROE on the Eurotunnel project was 14.4% over its 50-year life, lower than the rate that a fund manager would need to offer in order to obtain a lowinterest bank loan in 1990Despite all this, it was clearly not in the interests of either the banks or the shareholders to allow Eurotunnel to fail at that pointIn 1992, as filed a claim in the TML court for an additional £ 1.5 billion, it became apparent that Eurotunnel would not be able to carry on without new financingHowever, it was clear that without a new injection of funds soon after the opening, Eurotunnel would not be able to operate for long; the funds would be needed primarily to pay bank interest until breakeven cash flow was reachedAlthough there are many financial difficulties, however I personally then this project must be cast out because of several factors. First are the historical factor. The idea of a tunnel connecting England to France 2 to enhance the trade already from the time of Emperor Napoleon 1 However, after all these concerns hinders political, security, the project was completed. This project helps strengthen the trade links of the UK and the rest of Europe. Economically, this project brings economic growth sources under huge expectations for not only Britain but also the European Union.the English crew cut loose deep connection the text helps the peppers give it a long paragraph.OKquestion 5This thing in this case is completely correct, this is a great project and reflective of international stature, it is the longest sea tunnel in the world until the present time, therefore, the difficulties encountered in the process of construction is inevitable. So project managers are responsible for finding a solution to this project made to be by the elements of politics, the economy, the amount invested to complete the project. On the reality show, project managers and Governments of both countries was very trying for the support extended by another 10 years time mining for eurotunnel units by the year 2024 leading to the opening of the tunnel in May 1994. In the current difficulties in the encounter, the greatest difficulty is the contradiction between TML and Eurotunnel about the clause in the contract. due to the Eurotunnel and after again completely passive about the dc Council has pink signed earlier. This is the biggest obstacle. From there the stagnation of progress of the work leading to the lender, the shareholders were not sitting still.Chat Conversation EndType a message ...
Being translated, please wait..
