Execution might be an efficient pen

Execution might be an efficient penalty in order to decline crime rates and assure the strictness of legislation. From my perspective, death warrants should be replaced by life sentence for moral purposes as an ethic standard of society.

Capital punishment has several drawbacks. Firstly, there is a belief that no one can have the right of killing people. Consequently, for serious crimes such as killer, execution becomes unscrupulous in comparison with humanitarian principles that have been made. Secondly, even hanging, beheading or lethal injection, this penalty appears as a form of revenge which could just ease the hatred of the mob in a certain time but cannot heal the pain of victims or the family. Finally, an increasing number of people wrongly executed is one of the downsides. Due to lack of evidence, subjective opinions and the pressure of community, many innocent suspects have been killed. As a result, capital punishment should be repealed from the law and practice .

On the one hand, I personally believe that life sentence is more appropriate for dangerous criminals and moral standards. In the medieval period, the death penalty was enacted to reduce the delinquency rates and eliminated deadly perpetrators forever. However, it is not true for modern society when benevolence is enhanced. Life imprisonment now has been applied widely in legal systems of developed countries because of its effectiveness. A powerful evidence proving the failing of capital punishment is that while America remains execution, they still have the highest crime rate..

In conclusion, the death penalty is not necessary to restrict violent behavior. Alternatively, life sentence is a real punishment torturing the criminals by the court of conscience.

Results (English) 2:

Efficient Execution Might Be an order to decline the penalty in crime rates and Assure the strictness of legislation. From my perspective, death nên Warrants by life sentence for moral thế Purposes as an ethic standard of society. Capital punishment has vài drawbacks. Firstly, there is a Belief That no one can have the right of killing People. Consequently, for serious crimes như killer, in comparison with unscrupulous execution Becomes có được made ​​Humanitarian Principles. Secondly, thậm hanging, beheading or lethal injection, this form of penalty vẻ as a revenge mà could just ease the hatred of the mob in A Certain time but can not heal the pain of Victims or the family. Finally, an tăng số người wrongly executed is one of the downsides. Due to Lack of Evidence, and the subjective opinions of community pressure, many innocent Suspects Killed past tense. As a result, capital punishment from the law repealed nên and practice. On the one hand, I Personally believe có life sentence is more dangerous for the appropriate Criminals and moral standards. In the medieval period, the death penalty was enacted to Reduce delinquency rates and eliminated the deadly perpetrators forever. Tuy nhiên, it is not true for modern society is enhanced khi benevolence. Life Imprisonment now bị áp widely in legal systems of Developed Countries vì nó effectiveness. A powerful Evidence proving the Failing of capital punishment is America Remains khi có execution, chúng still have the Highest crime rate .. In Conclusion, the death penalty is not NECESSARY to restrict Violent behavior. Alternatively, life sentence is a real punishment by the court torturing the Criminals Of Conscience.