Results (
English) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
The conclusionMalpractice situations: Therefore, the liability for compensation of the 5 star Hotel Grand Rose was reasonable because of the lack of responsibility in the task of fire prevention for their hotel and not to protect their customers.The Grand Hotel Rose will take responsibility for the damage caused. They must compensate the injured and the others to act if needed to remedy for tort of they suffered. The amount of compensation for the victims and third parties (United Party Conference & exhibition) will be decided based on the judgment of the Court. Negligence can be used as special protection for the Hotel Grand Hotel Rose in this situation. So, both of them (the Grand Rose hotel and third parties) will compensate for the crash which caused the fire caused, it is because they do not have to prepare security for the customer.And finally, from Grand Rose hotel, they will propose a number of solutions to avoid the same mistake as the tightening of security management, provide staff training on fire prevention skills, discussions with third parties about the storage and fire prevention terms to prevent unfortunate cases in combination with regular follow-up on how many third parties comply with the terms. The two on the right should have the special combination with each other, to create security for another to preserve credibility, safety for both you and your customers a safe way.
Being translated, please wait..
