The WHO rankings have been subject

The WHO rankings have been subject to many and varied criticisms since its publication. Concerns raised over the five factors considered, data sets used and comparison methodologies have led health bodies and political commentators in most of the countries on the list to question the efficacy of its results and validity of any conclusions drawn. Such criticisms of a broad endeavour by the WHO to rank all the world's healthcare systems must also however be understood in the context of a predisposition to analytical bias commensurate with an individual nation's demographics, socio-economics and politics. In considering such a disparate global spectrum, ranking criteria, methodology, results and conclusions will always be an area for contention.

Results (English) 1:

The WHO rankings have been subject to many and varied criticisms since its publication. Concerns raised over the five factors considered, the data sets used and comparison methodologies have led health bodies and political commentators in most of the countries on the list to question the efficacy of its results and validity of any conclusions drawn. Such criticisms of a broad endeavour by the WHO to rank all the world's healthcare systems must also however be understood in the context of a predisposition to analytical bias commensurate with an individual nation's demographics, socio-economics and politics. In considering such a disparate global spectrum, the ranking criteria, methodology, results and conclusions will always be an area for contention.

Results (English) 2:

The WHO rankings past tense subject to many and varied criticisms Since the its publication. Concerns raised over the five Factors Considered, comparison data sets and methodologies have led USED health bodies and Political commentators in Most of the Countries on the list to question the efficacy of the its results and validity of any conclusions drawn. Such criticisms of a broad Endeavour by the WHO to rank all the world's healthcare systems cũng phải be understood in the context Tuy nhiên of a predisposition to an analytical bias commensurate with the individual nation's Demographics, Socio-economics and politics. In considering Such a disparate global spectrum, ranking criteria, Methodology, results and conclusions Will always be an area for contention.